{"id":4,"date":"2019-01-09T01:22:29","date_gmt":"2019-01-09T01:22:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/?p=4"},"modified":"2019-01-09T13:58:03","modified_gmt":"2019-01-09T13:58:03","slug":"heroes-what-they-are-and-what-they-do","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/2019\/01\/09\/heroes-what-they-are-and-what-they-do\/","title":{"rendered":"Heroes Who They Are And What They Do"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Overall, this reading was straightforward. &nbsp;Goethals and Allison laid out their ideas about who a hero was to the public and then supported their views with logical reasoning and \u201cscientific\u201d studies. However, I don\u2019t agree with how they conducted one of their studies. &nbsp;The authors asked a group of 75 people to rank heroes and villains on a scale from 1 to 10. In the studies, Goethals and Allison found that real villains ranked at a score of 3.9 while their fictional counterparts had a rating of 2.2. &nbsp;They also found out that real heroes had a score of 7.8 while their fictional counterparts had a score of 8.7. (chart from chapter shown below)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lh6.googleusercontent.com\/cQDTDsTTLP04GTqTGnDnb9aPgcGyXGq980N8sKlXG7vypHs6Rutr8E7tCxdIZK8cmQwXKvozAzj4n4fdPi3nNeWHGsRUGj5VoiuOMjUP4LHGi-b_eAp4xRL53Ieta11leEMZSFSh\" alt=\"\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The authors stated that &#8220;this average difference was unlikely to be due to chance or random variation&#8221; (35). I felt that this was a small sample size. After some research, my concerns were proven correct by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencebuddies.org\/science-fair-projects\/references\/sample-size-surveys\">this<\/a> website. \u00a0I made the following chart using the website\u2019s data. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lh5.googleusercontent.com\/n1LClile5_WHePdHwg0MkMsg3Q83Am1Z0KA3b404LyR97Y36_sHjEcts4ndKKICXxFdCLIPzKOyJtRjpPaJ-UELPOtlQDwQC7OmMgeMUKzL_mQNaL99w2V6nxocnV8yFBW-7Gey-\" alt=\"\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>With a sample size of 75 participants, the error bounds would be about 11.5%. \u00a0While their conclusion that fictional characters are exaggerated in qualities to create an exciting story makes sense, their sample size makes their study nearly invalid. \u00a0This 11.5% error is enough to make the rankings of the heroes swap places (real: 8.7 vs. fiction: 7.7), meaning that real-life heroes can be ranked higher than their fictional counterparts. \u00a0This 11.5% error can also close the gap between the villain scores to make their qualities look less exaggerated in fiction (real: 3.45 vs. fiction 2.45). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I believe that if Goethals and Allison used a bigger sample size, they would be able to retain similar results still, but would increase their accuracy and credibility. \u00a0In turn, this would allow them to have a stronger claim with better data while maintaining their beliefs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Overall, this reading was straightforward. &nbsp;Goethals and Allison laid out their ideas about who a hero was to the public and then supported their views with logical reasoning and \u201cscientific\u201d studies. However, I don\u2019t agree with how they conducted one of their studies. &nbsp;The authors asked a group of 75 people to rank heroes and &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/2019\/01\/09\/heroes-what-they-are-and-what-they-do\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Heroes Who They Are And What They Do&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2418,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"qubely_global_settings":"","qubely_interactions":"","kk_blocks_editor_width":"","_kiokenblocks_attr":"","_kiokenblocks_dimensions":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry"],"gutentor_comment":0,"qubely_featured_image_url":null,"qubely_author":{"display_name":"wmertke2022","author_link":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/author\/wmertke2022\/"},"qubely_comment":0,"qubely_category":"<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/category\/uncategorized\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Uncategorized<\/a>","qubely_excerpt":"Overall, this reading was straightforward. &nbsp;Goethals and Allison laid out their ideas about who a hero was to the public and then supported their views with logical reasoning and \u201cscientific\u201d studies. However, I don\u2019t agree with how they conducted one of their studies. &nbsp;The authors asked a group of 75 people to rank heroes and&hellip;","post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2418"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4\/revisions\/9"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/wmertke\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}