Category Archives: Uncategorized

The chapter “‘Reading’ Cybercultures,” by author Pramod K. Nayar is the first chapter of his book An Introduction to New Media and Cybercultures. Nayar speaks on the topic of new media and cybercultures, arguing for a connection between this alternate reality, and the material world. He argues that there’s almost a symbiotic relationship between the internet, and the physical world; a relationship in which cause and effect bounce between both spaces.

Nayar starts with his definition of a cyberspace, claiming that this “space” is not limited to just the alternate realities of programs such as Second Life.

While virtual reality (VR) environments are fashionable for academic
studies of cyberculture, they do not, as Lisa Nakamura (2006) rightly points out, constitute the bulk of the experience of users of digital technology. Blogs and games, the homepage and social networking, online shopping and chat are more central to the common and the everyday, and if cyberculture studies hopes to draw from the frameworks of cultural studies – which is grounded in the everyday – it must turn to the popular Internet rather than the exotic environments of VR labs.

Because of the breadth of cyberspace, it’s only natural too that there exists many cybercultures. This is Nayar’s next argument. He develops this concept by examining cultural groups that exist both in cyberspace and the material world. This includes, but is not limited to, race, gender, and sexuality.

While all this may seem like common knowledge, we have to remember that a few years ago, possibly within a time frame we can still remember, none of this existed. Cyberspace was still the stuff of movies, and the idea of carrying the world wide web in your pocket was far far away. Now, with all this new technology (or new media as Nayar puts it) there are social ripples that some of us may not even see yet — especially the newer generations.

A specific ripple that can be noticed within Nayar’s text is the contrasting events of the digital divide and civil society. In it’s simplest form, the digital divide can be defined as the gap between society caused by the ownership, or lack thereof, of digital technologies. It’s basically the Matthew effect, driven by technological advancement. In contrast, Nayar’s discussion of civil society reflects an idea of a more globalized world aided by the universality of the internet.

Nayar’s overview of the existence of cyberculture, and it’s effect in the physical world is a very brief and basic discussion (yet appropriate for it’s purpose), especially when considering the extent to which cyberspace can, and is, really effecting the world.

This will probably be the easiest blog post I get to write for the whole class, considering I read movie reviews for fun. I binge on movies every chance I get, and when it comes looking for advice, Roger Ebert is like my right hand man. I read his site like an overly obsessed girlfriend, and I try to watch every 3-4 star movie he reviews. Sometimes, I get a little rebellious and watch his < 2 star movies, just to see if he was right, but I have to say, more than not, the man knows what he’s doing.

Ebert writes his for the Chicago Sun-Times. You can find all his reviews at this site. The movie reviews listed are all current, and range from indie flicks to Hollywood blockbusters. The site is structured so that you can easily find a current movie review from a list on the right side, or just see what he’s recently posted in the middle. Towards the bottom of the page, he has a little area dedicated to an “overlooked movie of the week.” So, as far as infrastructure goes, it’s pretty basic. It’s definitely not the highlight of the blog — if anything, it could use some work.

As far as content goes though, this is movie critic gold (but I guess that’s strictly subjective). Each review posted is unlike the last. There are no generic “this is a good film” reviews. Some posts rave about the setting (see Snow White and the Huntsman), while others question the comprehension of the plot (The Words). What can be said is that you may learn more about movies than you intend after reading a few of his reviews. Ebert is well versed when it comes to how to watch a movie, paying attention to all aspects of development and production within his articles. His extent of analysis almost seems exhausting at times. From reading his reviews, I’ve learned to pay attention to more than just the acting or the story. And of course, those who write invariably also read, which makes for interesting literary parallels every now and then.

On top of Ebert’s movie reviews written for the Chicago Sun-Times, he also maintains a journal that makes for a pretty good read. The man never stops writing, and for good reason. Sometimes if a movie is just that good, he’ll write more and more about it. Multiple articles exist on movies like Prometheus, The Big Lebowski, and Pulp Fiction — and rightly so — cause any good reviewer knows that you can never really say all that there is to say in one sitting.