In response to Konnor’s blog:
You see a desert and I see an abyss. Obviously we think very differently, and that is just what we need in this day and age, but that is another discussion for another time.
I really really like the way you are taking your research. Your whole paper involves meta-thought. Thinking about your thinking, or in this case, researching about research. Kudos to you. I feel like everything would get extremely complex and interwoven, to the point where I would have to take a break from reading and research every 15 minutes. And I can’t even image how difficult your sources must be to dissect and make sense of. I’d have issues just mapping everything together!
Source: Giphy
And then you say that most of your research contains gap! It all seems so daunting! How long does it take you to find a source?
Anyway, I really liked your blog post. It gave a very good description of “gaps” and “territory”, and a good personal example of each. I also got a general direction of where your paper is going, and it sounds VERY professional and scholarly, like the sources we read for class!
Good luck crossing your desert, I’m sure you’ll find something, anything, which will lead to a chain of events and sources, and everything will just snap into place. If I stumble across anything, I’ll keep you in mind and foreword it to you. I hope you catch up on your bibliographies and make sense of everything It all just builds for an even better paper!
Media Sources:
