Again, in sociology we talked about technology and how it affects people around the world. But today we watched a video, and in that video people were going around interviewing people. They got almost everybody’s perspective on whether technology was good for the general public or not. The people who created the video found people that would give them the perspective of, people involved with technology, scientist running text on how tech effects people and phycologist to do the same as scientist. When watching this it reminded me of what we went over in class yesterday. These researchers were able to prove and give evidence for their argument by showing many different point of views through many different primary sources.
It got me thinking, and I have honestly only really used secondary sources in my past research papers and I now believe that primary sources are the best. I feel they are the most credible and affect the reader the most. Because they are conducted by the person writing the research it adds complete creditability to the person, allowing the reader to trust the author.