In our Financial Information Systems class, we have been discussing why it is imperative for companies to maintain a FIS and why many don’t have one. One huge barrier to entry is the sheer cost and complexity of transitioning to a FIS. Fi$Cal, California’s planned FIS demonstrates this.
California began transitioning its accounting system to Fi$Cal in 2005, eleven years ago. As the system serves an entire state, it’s reasonable for it to take a long time, as CA needs it to be functional at all times despite the ongoing transition. However, according to state auditor Elaine Howle, the project will take at least another two years and an extra $237M, putting total costs above $900M. Clearly, costs (opportunity and financial) are much too high for every company to afford.
Although it is costly and daunting to switch to a comprehensive FIS, I am proud of California for staying on top of its financials and utilizing the technological expertise of the state. The costs of installation are massive, but the rewards and utility gained are even more so once fully installed. I’m curious to see how California’s reporting and management of assets will change after the FIS is installed.
Source: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/the-state-worker/article124839264.html