Financial Tech in Rwanda and India

Financial technology is not only making processes quicker in developed countries such as the U.S. however, it also benefits underdeveloped countries like Rwanda and India. In Rwanda specifically, the article states that they have one of the fastest-growing economies in sub-Sahara Africa. In combination to its policies which support businesses and financial technology, business is more fluid than it has ever been. In this type of environment, it is very clear as to how financial technology aides and expedites financial processes. With the financial technology, individuals do not have to walk somewhere to perform financial transactions. Apparently Rwanda’s goal is to be a cashless economy. This is possibly the direction that many other countries will head into in the future, not just businesses but also consumers. In addition, India is moving to be a cashless economy, but their reason is to fight corruption, fraud, and illegal cash holdings. Their Prime Minister stated that debit and credit cards, ATM machines, and POS systems would be irrelevant by 2020. Instead, their apps called Bhim would be used to transfer money between users. This app would be linked to the Aadhar app, which is a unique identification program to incorporate thumbprints.

Link: http://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/article/2017-02-07/207756/

Fintech in Insurance

Here are my views on Fintech in Insurance:

Insurance is one of the under-tapped markets in both life and nonlife.

Metromile, the auto insurance company product pay per mile is making its way in the market and disrupting the traditional system, here the people can pay only what they use for, unlike the traditional insurance.  It is also introduced products for mixed usage both commercial and residential, this product is becoming relevant in current days because of people like Uber use the same vehicles for both purposes. This would pave a way for the industry to introduce new and competitive products.

Another insurance product where fin tech is gaining is microinsurance. There are several microinsurance companies like GrassRoots Bima which are providing insurance services in underdeveloped countries. This type of companies are not only financially sustainable but also provide services and paving way for financial inclusion.Generally, these markets are small for big players, companies like this providing innovative solutions are solving problems with technological innovation.

In this way, Insurance is one of the sectors being disrupted by fin tech across the markets.

 

References:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_Insurance_Corporation

https://www.fastcompany.com/3066666/5-fintech-startups-to-watch-in-2017

38 FinTech Companies in Kenya to Look out for in 2017

 

The Effect Of Travel Bans On Fintech

Trump has recently revised his controversial travel ban, excluding Iraqis from the embargo. What are the implications from this prevention of entry mean for fintech and its growth? Fintech is blossoming globally, with hubs springing up on every continent. What contributed to its fast-paced growth is the world’s ability to share ideas without any obstacles. This includes investing in developing countries and watching their potential become real. After Trump’s first travel ban, 127 tech companies, including Apple, Facebook, and Google filed orders against the ban based on constitutional reasons. For fintech firms based in Iran, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, Sudan, and Syria, regulation is the biggest obstacle they face. With the fintech talent unable to enter the US, its questionable if US investors can see the potential in these startups from abroad.

 

I believe this travel ban hurts the fintech sector overall. It puts an obstacle in the way of innovation that is fostered from worldwide competition. When a law is put up that people from these country cannot enter the US, we lose the talent they bring. It also gives the opportunity for other countries more accepting of immigrants to gain from their innovation.

 

Source: The Effect of Travel Bans on Fintech 

Canadian Regulator Says Open Data Essential to Fintech

This article discusses a white paper put out by the Ontario Securities Commission on Monday. Pat Chaukos, the chief of OSC, stated that financial technologies like blockchain can’t grow and innovate without open-access data. For example, having a client’s “core information” available would allow regulators to streamline information gathering, analyzing, and verifying. The paper argues that this would make compliance with regulations easier because there would be a standard system.

However, financial institutions might not be inclined to make these changes because they will be hesitant to make the core client information available to other entities. Chaukos acknowledged that the open-access data approach would increase competition. While that is good news for investors, financial institutions might not be so thrilled to have their industry dramatically change.

 

 

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/canadian-regulator-says-open-data-012807908.html

Fintech, the US Government, and Regulations

The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has been receiving criticism for a proposal considering a charter designating fintechs to be licensed as “special purpose national banks” (BI Intelligence). OCC Head Thomas Curry defended the charter through several points. Ultimately, many of the concerns centered around an unclear definition of fintechs and what they would qualify for. Curry clarified that fintechs would not be required to take deposits to qualify for the charter, and that instead, “a company offering any combination of federal banking services falls under the OCC’s mandate” (BI Intelligence). This makes all or at least most fintechs qualified for the charter without individual Congress approval. The next concern was about loose regulations allowing fintechs to take advantage of loopholes and not prioritize consumer protection. Curry only added here that “predatory” fintechs would not be given charter, and that all chartered fintechs would be subject to stringent regulation.

I personally see value in giving legal and regulatory recommendation. As fintechs expand, it is important to have clear definitions and be able to protect consumers. These criticisms do not give me much clarity that this charter is the way to go. While Curry defended it well, and I believe was clearly able to discuss the definition of a qualifying fintech, I am more concerned about regulations and consumer protections. Curry was unable to elaborate as well on how consumers would be protected or fintechs would be prevented from exploiting loopholes. I think full consumer awareness is vital, and since they have much less power than a corporation should something go wrong, need to be fully protected.

Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-us-government-is-defending-its-fintech-charter-2017-3

Fintech Needs to Go Solo

On March 5th, 2017, some of the UK’s biggest fintech firms had to suspend their services after customers were unable to make payments. This was due to a technical failure from their third-party payment processor used to connect to the Mastercard payment network. Many fintech firms rely on third-party processors to connect to payment networks, rather than building their own systems to save money. Traditional banking institutions, however, directly connect to payment networks, and their advantage is system stability.

Fintech firms using third-party processors do not have control over how fast a glitch is fixed, and they cannot provide customers a time-frame for when the issue would be corrected. By using third-party processors, fintech firms are more likely to encounter an outage.

To stabilize systems, fintech firms should directly connect to payment networks. While it would increase costs, customer satisfaction and loyalty might increase. Having a stable system is necessary to retaining customers, which drives the firms’ success. Due to the large economy of scale that is required to build a direct payment network, I believe that only a few fintech companies would have the resources to do so. Thus, they will become the bigger market players.

Reference: http://uk.businessinsider.com/fintechs-need-to-go-solo-2017-3?r=US&IR=T&utm_content=buffer339b5&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Different Types of Audit

Abstract: Auditing plays an important role in all types of information systems and especially in financial information systems. Its role is critical in fraud prevention, detection or finding false positive. We will briefly talk about different types of auditing.

Audit is an appraisal activity undertaken by an independent practitioner (e.g. an external auditor) to provide assurance to a principal (e.g. shareholders) over a subject matter (e.g. financial statements) which is the primary responsibility of another person (e.g. directors) against a given criteria or framework (e.g. IFRS and GAAP). Auditing is a highly complex process, and the importance of auditors as a vital link in the financial reporting chain has never been more important nor their role as trusted advisors more valued. Below we will review different types of auditing:

External audit: Also known as financial audit and statutory audit, involves the examination of the truth and fairness of the financial statements of an entity by an external auditor who is independent of the organization in accordance with a reporting framework such as the IFRS. Company law in most jurisdictions requires external audit on annual basis for companies above a certain size.

Internal audit: also referred as operational audit, is a voluntary appraisal activity undertaken by an organization to provide assurance over the effectiveness of internal controls, risk management and governance to facilitate the achievement of organizational objectives.

Information system audit: involves the assessment of the controls relevant to the IT infrastructure within an organization. Information system audits may be performed as part of the internal control assessment during internal or external audit.

Compliance audit: In many countries, companies are required to conduct specific audit engagements other than the statutory audit to comply with the requirements of particular laws and regulations.

Investigative audit: This is an audit that takes place as a result of a report of unusual or suspicious activity on the part of an individual or a department. It is usually focused on specific aspects of the work of a department or individual.

Follow up audit: These are audits conducted approximately six months after an internal or external audit report has been issued. They are designed to evaluate corrective action that has been taken on the audit issues reported in the original report. When these follow-up audits are done on external auditors’ reports, the results of the follow-up may be reported to those external auditors.

Conclusion: There are even more types of auditing than what we have discussed above such as process audit, integrated audit, environmental and social audit and value for money audit. All types of audits, however, looking for a simple goal; preventing and detecting fraud in the system. Although more complicated auditing systems means we would face more complex fraud to detect.

References:

https://daf.csulb.edu/offices/univ_svcs/internalauditing/audits.html

https://finance.columbia.edu/content/types-audits

https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/audit/solutions/what-is-audit.html

https://daf.csulb.edu/offices/univ_svcs/internalauditing/audits.html

Unconventional channels driving mobile payments adoption

The number of people worldwide using mobile phones are impressive at almost 5 billion people with 40 percent of all mobile device users in the U.S. having made at least one mobile payment in this past year. Despite these strong numbers, the adoption of mobile payments hasn’t come as quickly as expected. A possible solution for it to gain momentum could by through unconventional channels including virtual reality and in-vehicle payment systems.

Virtual Reality

In just two years, it is projected that more than 170 people will own virtual reality products. It will soon be a reality where consumers who want to purchase an item can browse a store, check out items of interest and quickly pay for whatever they need–all in VR. As VR technology grows in popularity, we will see it intertwine with mobile payments. For example, online marketplace, Alibaba has already started working on a payment service that will allow VR shoppers to pay for things just by nodding their heads.

In-vehicle Payment Systems

There has been a slow shift towards the offering of paying in-vehicles. Credit card companies and vehicle manufacturers such as Visa and Honda, are working together to provide in-vehicle mobile payment solutions, making it easier and faster to pay for gas and parking. Both companies are working with fuel pump manufacturer Gilbarco Veeder-Root and parking solutions provider IPS Group to install beacons that will communicate with a Honda via Bluetooth in order to complete payments through a Visa Checkout integration with what’s essentially a “smart” dashboard.

In my opinion, this is an exciting opportunity, but I’m skeptical of consumer adoption. I think Honda and Visa will have to spend a lot of marketing dollars to raise consumers awareness and educate drivers on the benefits as well as how it works. I’m also unsure if fuel pump operators will want to adopt this system. This new system completely cuts them out of the picture — a driver only has to interact with the actual fuel dispenser at the gas station. Another challenge that might hinder this is ensuring that Honda and Visa can set up beacons in all the cities. If the feature is not widely accepted, I don’t think consumers will care for it.

Source: https://www.mobilepaymentstoday.com/articles/unconventional-channels-driving-mobile-payments-adoption/

China property giant Wanda partners with UnionPay to expand mobile payment scheme

China’s largest commercial property developer joined hands with the leading payment services provider on Thursday in the latest example of online to offline integration that is reshaping the nation’s retail landscape.

Dalian Wanda Group and credit card provider China Union Pay announced a partnership that will see UnionPay QuickPass, a chip-based contactless payment service, introduced to 187 Wanda Plazas, 51 department stores, 102 hotels, five theme parks and millions of Wanda partner merchants.

In my option, the mobile payment industry started online and is moving more towards offline.  The online and offline integration is not just getting more consumers by making payment easier. The off-line retails can also take advantage of the data through the mobile payment to study the buying behaviors of the habits and it will help the off-line retails to better conduct promotions online and offline.

http://www.scmp.com/business/companies/article/2075510/china-property-giant-wanda-partners-unionpay-expand-mobile

Beacon Based Mobile Payment Solutions II

In continuation of my last week’s blog Beacon Based Mobile Payment Solutions here are few more innovative companies that leverage iBeacon technology to deliver valuable payment solutions.

 PassMarket

3iMobile3’s cloud based PassMarket platform enables retailers to offer gift cards and mobile payments, powered by iBeacon technology. The PassMarket platform and application are intended to optimize the loyalty, rewards, gift cards and payments processes for both retailers and consumers. Consumers who join the participating retailer’s loyalty program are required to install a virtual beacon enabled pass in their mobile wallet.The beacons can then be used to inform consumers to redeem coupons, earn points or pick-up items on their shopping lists and make payments for them.

TruBeacon

TruBeacon is a services platform that enables retailers of all sizes and types (restaurants, hospitals, malls, sports arenas) to engage, manage, and provide payment options to shoppers. It has developed a range of Bluetooth-based technologies for mobile payments across different market segments, such as healthcare, data management, payments, rewards, community banks and credit unions.

TruBeacon’s Payments Beacon is a white label platform that works with smartphones, payment terminals and other point of sale technology systems. It provides an API that allows retailers and banks to incorporate mobile wallets into their iPhone and Android apps, supporting contactless payments, e-receipts and offer redemption.

LabWerk

LabWerk is an Amsterdam based start-up creating innovative applications using iBeacon technology. The platform connects the digital and physical worlds, enabling businesses to communicate with their customers at all touch points. The platform connects the digital and physical worlds, enabling businesses (from museums to festivals to airports) to communicate with their customers at all touch points via an all-in-one app.

The app allows businesses to easily process payments, without the need for expensive point-of-sale equipment, using iBeacon technology and the customer’s mobile device.

Conclusion

Beacon enabled payment solutions are the natural next step in the iBeacon technology landscape. Currently, beacon applications are largely used in the couponing and brand loyalty space, where the payment and redemption of the coupon may not always be processed inside the app; which is why combining a beacon based wallet or payment solution is the best way to build a completely seamless consumer experience.

Refrences:

https://blog.beaconstac.com/2016/05/beacon-based-mobile-payments-4-brands-that-are-doing-it-right/

https://www.passmarket.com/

http://labwerk.com/

https://www.trubeacon.com/