{"id":1061,"date":"2017-02-26T23:24:19","date_gmt":"2017-02-26T23:24:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/?p=1061"},"modified":"2017-02-26T23:24:19","modified_gmt":"2017-02-26T23:24:19","slug":"working-mothers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/2017\/02\/26\/working-mothers\/","title":{"rendered":"Working Mothers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Working Mothers<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The Visualization \u201cWorking Mothers\u201d is a good example of interactivity with usage of different tableau features but \u00a0it is too general and\u00a0lacks claim, argument, predictions etc.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The visualization shows the percentage of working mothers from 1860 to 2010 in US, there are 3 different charts, two for comparing 2 years and another showing change in the ranking for the years selected. We can select the years using a slider.\u00a0All three charts are dynamically connected.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">What I like\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Slider bar to select different years for comparison<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Interactivity between all three charts<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Showing of ranking and its increase and decrease at the same time, using lines<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is missing\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">If Region level data is included, the audience can see the variation of working women over the course of time across regions like south, south-east etc.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The visualization compares just two years and there is no way to see the variations across time and comparing the same to two different regions\/states can add an argument\/claim to the visualization<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience &#8211; The audience to this visualization is not clear\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Claim &#8211; There is no claim, for ex &#8211; \u00a0there has been an increase of working mothers after 1950<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Argument &#8211; the Visualization is not making any argument like \u201cx\u201d state has more working mother\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\">Action and Prediction elements are\u00a0missing, it would be a nice add on to predict number of working mothers over the next 50 years<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>For the above even though the visualization makes use of cool tableau features it lacks in the essential elements like Argument and prediction.<\/p>\n<p>Source -https:\/\/public.tableau.com\/profile\/adam.davis5609#!\/vizhome\/WorkingMothers\/WorkingMothersStateRates<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Working Mothers The Visualization \u201cWorking Mothers\u201d is a good example of interactivity with usage of different tableau features but \u00a0it is too general and\u00a0lacks claim, argument, predictions etc. The visualization shows the percentage of working mothers from 1860 to 2010 in US, there are 3 different charts, two for comparing 2 years and another showing &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/2017\/02\/26\/working-mothers\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Working Mothers<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1857,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"qubely_global_settings":"","qubely_interactions":"","kk_blocks_editor_width":"","_kiokenblocks_attr":"","_kiokenblocks_dimensions":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"gutentor_comment":0,"qubely_featured_image_url":null,"qubely_author":{"display_name":"shraavya","author_link":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/author\/shraavya\/"},"qubely_comment":0,"qubely_category":"<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/category\/uncategorized\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Uncategorized<\/a>","qubely_excerpt":"Working Mothers The Visualization \u201cWorking Mothers\u201d is a good example of interactivity with usage of different tableau features but \u00a0it is too general and\u00a0lacks claim, argument, predictions etc. The visualization shows the percentage of working mothers from 1860 to 2010 in US, there are 3 different charts, two for comparing 2 years and another showing&hellip;","post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1857"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1061"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1061\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1062,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1061\/revisions\/1062"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.scu.edu\/dataviz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}