9: Little Brother, Ch 11-21

The second half of Doctorow’s tale of civil disobedience completes the story arc; efforts to secure Xnet cryptographically are met later with the knowledge that the network has been infiltrated by DHS-sympathetic data miners seeking out M1k3y’s true identity. In the physical realm, too, Marcus’ alter-ego as the so-called leader of the Xnet movement becomes known to a number of folks. He finds himself at odds with classmates and teachers at school, resulting in his ultimate suspension. It is unclear exactly whom he can trust throughout the final ten chapters, even failing to reveal his online identity to his parents whilst spilling the beans concerning his initial stint in captivity. Marcus’ capture marks the climax of the story, but the subsequent dissolution of the DHS presence in California follows as a result of his confidence in the freedom of press.

One can’t help but feel that a longer, well-fleshed out version of this story would be a really good read. Unfortunately, the brevity of Doctorow’s conclusion leaves a trite taste in my mouth. I’m left wanting to know more about the political wheels that have been put in action in California, and to know more about the underpinnings of the DHS activities in the area. I feel that narration from the perspective of another character or two — maybe a DHS affiliate (even if not totally sympathetic, like Masha) and Marcus’ parents — would make this a more worthwhile read, even though the focus of the story is resistance by a younger generation (for a younger generation).

Still, Doctorow’s central theme of civil disobedience as integral to the health of democracy is valuable to consider, and maybe more importantly, his introduction of the Internet as a viable medium for it. In his view, technological literacy and political engagement are nothing short of inseparable for future generations. Especially since American lawmakers are beginning to grasp the idea that the Internet might require regulation (all notions of monitoring aside for now, we’re constantly watched by cookies — “little dogs following you around, sniffing at everything you do on the Internet”). As a medium for discourse and organization, the digital realm remains an invaluable asset to any interest group, one that ought not be monopolized by governments or corporations. We will have to be wary of setting dangerous cyber-law precedents and in retaining the ability to manage our own privacy moving forward. Doctorow wants us to recognize the as-of-now uncharted territory he depicts, if we come to it someday.