Categories
CTW Blogs <3

Fancy Conversation

Today I will be addressing a topic that I find very interesting: making arguments. In high school, I would never have imagined myself saying a sentence like the former. However, after 5 weeks in a college-level writing class and with plenty of new information in my brain, I am actually starting to find certain things to be much more appealing than they previously were. In chapter 7 of The Craft of Research, the authors make crafting claims and supporting them seem far less intimidating by connecting it to regular conversation.

This chapter makes it evident that rather than thinking of research papers as big, scary essays that we just want to finish writing, these papers should be enjoyable and exciting to craft by treating them like you would a casual, friendly argument. In common arguments, whether between friends, family, or strangers, you make claims, give your reasons, then use evidence to support your claims. Acknowledging and responding to the claims of others is also a daily occurrence in regular conversation. In the chapter, the authors state that using these same steps to craft a paper is simple: “there’s nothing arcane in any of that, because you do it in every conversation that inquires thoughtfully into an unsettled issue”(108).

Most people make claims every single day, just in regular life. For example, times such as right now when an important election is near, conversation is centered largely around politics, and arguing is often part of this conversation. This happens on social media quite often too – people will post media that makes a claim, viewers will comment on the post with conflicting views, and more will join into the conversation with their own claims and reasoning to support their views. I think that recognizing this idea – and understanding that essays and research papers are just fancy types of conversation – makes approaching a new piece of writing far less stressful.

Categories
CTW Blogs <3

I Blame The Teachers

I like to say that I’m a good writer – but not great. And personally, I blame the teachers. After nearly 14 years of education, I am finally learning how to share my voice effectively because I’m not afraid anymore. In the very first blog post of my college career, entitled “Strength”, I analyzed the fact that students are told to silence their own voices or else they won’t sound professional, and that this is actually not the best approach to writing. This affected me personally, as I used to read essays of other students and feel like mine did not match their level of academic greatness because they used bigger words than me. That blog post was a mere three weeks ago, yet life has changed quite a lot since then. I’ve written countless things and I’ve learned a lot too.

First, I’m not as scared as I was 3 weeks ago. We had to peer edit essays in English class, and I was scared that they would be absolutely scholarly and mine would be trash, but I found that my fellow college students are equally as good, if not worse at writing than I am. I found repetitive sentences, incomplete clauses, and grammatical errors in their essays, the same errors that I was so worried about in my own writing. In the They Say/ I say Chapters that we read, Graff and Birkenstein touched on metacommentary and connecting sentences. When I thought about these chapters, I realized how much I wasn’t taught in high school. My teachers never emphasized the importance of connecting sentences; hence, my fellow students always filled their essays with sentences that didn’t relate to each other and didn’t relate to the thesis itself, of course causing them to lose points. I did it too. But even then, our teachers didn’t tell us how to fix it – they told us to make it relate to our thesis, but how?

Metacommentary is another subject that I don’t think I ever heard before today. Of course, its meaning can be inferred, but I am certain that my high school English teachers never uttered that word in my four years there. “Metacommentary is a way of commenting on your claims and telling others how – and how not – to think about them,” (Kraft and Birkenstein, 131). As I view this definition, I realize that I never thought that I, the author of my own writing, am supposed to actually give my opinions and clarify my claims with my readers. Much like we were forced to silence our own voices to write academically in high school, we also felt afraid to clarify with our own thoughts and opinions on the subject because we thought it was unprofessional when that would’ve made our writing so much better. We were always told to say “them” not “you” as if the audience is a stranger. I want to write knowing that my voice and my opinions are important. There is a living, breathing person behind this keyboard.

Categories
CTW Blogs <3

So… Hero or Not?

Today’s blog post will be about Charlie Gillis’s controversial article, “Let’s Redefine Hero”. To summarize, Gillis uses this article to address the application of the word “hero” in a modern world. He argues that too many people are defined as heroes these days; that victims of terrorism and people doing their jobs being addressed as heroes takes away from the real heroic acts, such as the firefighters who died on 9/11 and people like Daniel Francis who crawled into a burning RV to save a young girl. Obviously, Gillis’s views are controversial, as everyone’s definition of “hero” is different; however, I will explain my stance on the topic.

On one hand, I agree with Gillis. People are so decorated nowadays for committing simple acts of human decency. One topic I couldn’t stop thinking about when reading this article was boys. Social media has its way of honoring young men who are simply being decent. For example, parties: a boy who doesn’t spike a girl’s drink, or who takes away a drink that he knows is spiked, is not a hero. He is being a nice, decent human being. Likewise, if he didn’t take the drink away, he would be the opposite of a hero. The meme that I featured, recognizing a coworker as a hero for trading shifts, is another situation that supports Gillis’s view: trading shifts with someone is not heroic, it is nice.

While his subject is not that of boys or trading shifts, Gillis represents the same stance with his opinions on Toronto Transit Authority’s recognition of its employees for doing the bare minimum: “The acts, however, turned out to be little more than gestures of common decency — the kind we should be ashamed not to do,” Gillis noted. Of course, it’s nice of you to stop your car if a child wanders into the street, but what else would you do, run them over? I think there are actions that make people decent, and actions that make people heroic. For example, when that child wanders into the busy street, those stopping their cars to avoid striking the child aren’t heroic – they’re decent. However, the person who risks their own life to run after the child and rescue them is, plausibly, a hero.

On the other hand, Gillis made some statements that did not sit right with me. He mentioned members of the military and victims of terrorism, arguing that their recognition takes away from real heroic acts. I think most Americans agree that marines and people alike (firefighters, police, etc.) are heroes. These people risk their lives and often die to keep countless people safe, and that is undoubtedly heroic. Furthermore, there are many victims of terrorism who are heroes. Rick Rescorla was a veteran who rescued countless people from one of the Twin Towers on 9/11 before he succumbed in the collapse; Todd Beamer and other passengers on Flight 93 stormed the cockpit of their hijacked plane, crashing it into a field before it could reach the Capitol building. These are just a few examples of victims who are also heroes. Nevertheless, people can recognize others as heroes with varying degrees.

Doctors are just one out of several types of workers who are considered to be heroes by many people.

To conclude, Gillis’s article is certainly controversial and destined to arouse negative feelings in people. In my opinion, his general idea is reasonable, however, some of the examples he uses are downright wrong. While it is acceptable to not recognize certain people or groups as heroes, stating your dissent for their recognition is disrespectful. As I said in my Dead or Alive post, not everyone’s heroes have to be yours, too.